HW, et al
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:18 pm
So, now that the solemnities are concluded, can we admit that HW Bush was a mediocre president with a long catalogue of malfeasance, and he looks great only by comparison?
I understand hagiography at the moment of passing, but can we eventually set the record straight?
This goes for all of them, from Washington on. I think we have a rare opportunity to understand that everyone who takes the office is just human, but that there are extra standards that are rightly to be applied, and there ought, at the end of their days, be a full and honest reckoning.
If this doesn't happen, we never learn anything, and are doomed as a culture and nation to blindly waltz to our rapid and ugly conclusion
I understand hagiography at the moment of passing, but can we eventually set the record straight?
This goes for all of them, from Washington on. I think we have a rare opportunity to understand that everyone who takes the office is just human, but that there are extra standards that are rightly to be applied, and there ought, at the end of their days, be a full and honest reckoning.
If this doesn't happen, we never learn anything, and are doomed as a culture and nation to blindly waltz to our rapid and ugly conclusion