Page 102 of 139

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 7:22 am
by Tahlvin
1952 #7:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 7:23 am
by poorpete
Hush yet another Carrie's Dad song, I wanted to talk Patti Page.

I dig the Patti Page country pop --

Forgot to point out Doggie in the Window -- not my favorite but it's not the turd society seems to think it is. It's good! And in 2009 she recorded a remake called "Do You See That Doggie in the Shelter" encouraging shelter adoptions because she was a nice person.

Also we haven't gotten to her best song. Next year, maybe?

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 8:43 am
by Tahlvin
1952 #6:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 8:48 am
by poorpete
Reputedly, Williams wrote and recorded a demo of "Half as Much" very quickly, in about an hour, at WHMA in Dothan.[3] But it was a big hit for Hank Williams, to whom it is sometimes credited because the writing credit to "C. Williams" on Hank Williams' record was often taken to be a typo. It was also a hit for Rosemary Clooney
Exactly what I thought, but yup, Curly Williams not Hank

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 9:54 am
by Tahlvin
1952 #5:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 10:06 am
by poorpete
I gave this song a chance to grow on me a few months ago and recently when prepping my best of 50s tourney, and -- for one, it's obviously uncool but I can't totally use that against it -- I've been listening to Silk Sonic play odes to songs from the 70s today, so I wonder if this was equally playing ode to songs 45 years prior, the great sleepy sing alongs of the early 1900s.

So yes, I'm blaming a 70 year old song for sounding like it's 115 years old :)

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 10:58 am
by Tahlvin
1952 #4:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 11:21 am
by poorpete
Love those vibes. Love the lyrics. Love the complimentary backing. But love love love Jo Stafford's warm performance. 10/10

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 11:37 am
by poorpete
Mike wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 6:23 am
Tahlvin wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 4:59 am 1952 #23:
I shouldn't judge a 70 year old song too harshly, I suppose, but I think I'm gonna. The lyrics are gross. They're patronizing and indulgent and a reminder of how deeply ingrained misogyny has always been in our culture. The whole "why do women take so long to get ready" bit has been a hackneyed part of American comedy since before this song was written. 1000 stand-ups did this through the 80's and 90's, it was played for laughs in a million sit-coms, including the Flintstones and the Jetsons way back. And it's always from the male point of view, asking, "Geez, what's wrong with these women?", completely ignoring the societal demands on woman for hair-removal, hair-styling, make-up, clothing that is all more expensive, more complicated, more delicate, and more subject to fashion whims than men's clothes, jewelry, accessories, and so on. Not to mention than unlike men, women have to make all this preparation while being mindful of the fact that they will be judged in most situations based on their appearance above any other factor.

And ignorance of all of this is what allows Pee Wee to cluck indulgently about how his little slow-poke sure can be aggravating, but -- ha ha -- what can you do... I guess I'll just have to be patient.

Yeah, that's probably too harsh.
Shock reveal.... the song, like You Belong to Me, was written by Chilton Price, and wikipedia hints it was written describing her friend, Pee Wee King, the singer of the song! Hubba-wha?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slow_Poke

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 11:50 am
by Tahlvin
1952 #3:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 12:25 pm
by poorpete
Poor old Johnnie Ray...

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 12:39 pm
by Tahlvin
1952 #2:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 12:46 pm
by poorpete
Not one of my favs, though I do like the "spinning spinning spinning" bridge with the pretty harmonies with herself. Its association with the game show hurts it, thought it's not the song's fault. Good... not great. 7/10

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 12:46 pm
by Mike
poorpete wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 11:37 am
Mike wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 6:23 am
Tahlvin wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 4:59 am 1952 #23:
I shouldn't judge a 70 year old song too harshly, I suppose, but I think I'm gonna. The lyrics are gross. They're patronizing and indulgent and a reminder of how deeply ingrained misogyny has always been in our culture. The whole "why do women take so long to get ready" bit has been a hackneyed part of American comedy since before this song was written. 1000 stand-ups did this through the 80's and 90's, it was played for laughs in a million sit-coms, including the Flintstones and the Jetsons way back. And it's always from the male point of view, asking, "Geez, what's wrong with these women?", completely ignoring the societal demands on woman for hair-removal, hair-styling, make-up, clothing that is all more expensive, more complicated, more delicate, and more subject to fashion whims than men's clothes, jewelry, accessories, and so on. Not to mention than unlike men, women have to make all this preparation while being mindful of the fact that they will be judged in most situations based on their appearance above any other factor.

And ignorance of all of this is what allows Pee Wee to cluck indulgently about how his little slow-poke sure can be aggravating, but -- ha ha -- what can you do... I guess I'll just have to be patient.

Yeah, that's probably too harsh.
Shock reveal.... the song, like You Belong to Me, was written by Chilton Price, and wikipedia hints it was written describing her friend, Pee Wee King, the singer of the song! Hubba-wha?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slow_Poke
Well dang. Ain't that something?

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 12:49 pm
by poorpete
Though the song may have been a hit partly because the gender swap worked with the stereotypes

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 1:17 pm
by Tahlvin
1952 #1:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2021 4:58 pm
by Kyle
Blue Wang

(Which May make you think of blue waffle, but please don’t google blue waffle.)

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 3:55 am
by Tahlvin
1951 #25:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:27 am
by poorpete
Feels quintessential classic pop... Overly orchestrated, overly yearning lyrics and overly crooning vocals. Makes sense it was a hit. Not a fan

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:40 am
by Kyle
I Apologize, by Chung Wangstine

Y’all! Y’all! I’m on fire! It’s like they just write themselves now! FIRE!

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 1:40 pm
by Mike
Kyle wrote: Sat Nov 13, 2021 6:40 am I Apologize, by Chung Wangstine

Y’all! Y’all! I’m on fire! It’s like they just write themselves now! FIRE!
I'm actually pretty jealous.

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 2:44 pm
by Tahlvin
1951 #24:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:56 pm
by Kyle
Wang Chunger

YES!

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 5:05 pm
by Tahlvin
1951 #23:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 8:10 pm
by Kyle
Wang Wang I Chung You

FUCK YEAH!

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2021 3:37 am
by Tahlvin
1951 #22:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2021 5:02 am
by Kyle
Yabba Dabba Wang

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2021 10:11 am
by poorpete
Carrie's Mom!

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2021 12:26 pm
by Mike
Has got it going on?

That doesn't sound right.

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2021 12:34 pm
by Tahlvin
1951 #21:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2021 1:36 pm
by poorpete
I think we're entering an era when people discovered popular music via two main outlets: the movies, where most love songs are sung romantically from one character to another. AND radio, where citizens listen to songs on variety shows at home to relax between 7 and 9 with family after a long day. These songs are pretty much tailored to these two outlets. Romantic to the point of cheese and slow to the point of sleep.

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2021 2:57 pm
by Tahlvin
1951 #20:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2021 5:31 pm
by Phoebe
Whatever era this is, I am glad this was not my pop music era. Just wretched from top to bottom.

Re: Deathless

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2021 8:29 pm
by poorpete
To defend 1951, there's still a lot that's great, though not much from the pop charts ... at least not yet. An example that probably won't show up here, Elmore James' blistering "Dust My Broom" which creates a full blues band sound that most future blues bands seem to emulate...



And here's Bud Powell's "Un Poco Loco" which is my favorite new-to-me jazz piece.



And the winner of the tournament was never released as a single, so won't be eligible for the pop charts, and in fact was recorded years earlier: This Land is Your Land

There are also a few truly great pop songs from this year, they haven't shown up yet, and if they don't I'll share them after #1.

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:39 am
by Tahlvin
1951 #19:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 5:08 am
by Kyle
Tahlvins getting up too early.

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 5:48 am
by poorpete
So I'd call that a good pop tune. Not sleepy at all!

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 5:52 am
by Tahlvin
Getting up at the normal time, just not doing a workout, so I'm online much earlier.

1951 #18:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 7:51 am
by poorpete
Saw my dad over the summer and I talked with him about my project and 1951 and mentioned Sweet Violets, figuring his sense of humor and being 13 at the time he must've liked it. My dad was unsure if he knew it, so I played it for him, and he just go so happy and animated, and we sung along together. It made my dad happy and created a lasting memory. 10/10

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 8:44 am
by Phoebe
That is wonderful! Good story for Monday morning.

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 8:47 am
by Tahlvin
1951 #17:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 9:24 am
by Kyle
Got nothing.

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 9:43 am
by Tahlvin
1951 #16:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 10:03 am
by Kyle
I feel like if you have to say that something's not a sin- then it probably is.

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 11:13 am
by Tahlvin
1951 #15:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 11:28 am
by poorpete
OK I'm back

My Wang Chungs for You

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 11:50 am
by Tahlvin
1951 #14:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 1:39 pm
by poorpete
Song alright but always enjoy Patti Page harmonizing with herself.

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 1:42 pm
by Tahlvin
Here's a strange double-up: the same song by two different artists.

1951 #13:

Re: Deathless

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2021 1:49 pm
by poorpete
Mary Ford harmonizing with herself is also enjoyable -- plus you get Les Paul doing hit nutzo guitar licks. Song still just alright.